Blackmon v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We have for review the negotiated plea agreement and sentence of the appellant, Marcus Blackmon. Blackmon argues that his pleas of guilty were improperly accepted because he was incompetent at the time. We agree and reverse.
Blackmon was charged with two counts of burglary of a conveyance. The trial court adjudicated him incompetent to proceed and ordered the Department of Chil dren and Families to provide competency-restoration and treatment.
At a later hearing, Blackmon entered into a negotiated plea of guilty to one count of burglary of a conveyance and one count of attempted burglary of a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Samson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- MacAluso v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Catinella v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bennie John Ross v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Vestal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Blackmon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Dortch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- VERNSON EDWARD DORTCH v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018