Legal Opinion

Edson v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 12987PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This proceeding was brought by Frank Edson, as employer, and by State Compensation Insurance Fund, as his insurance carrier, to review and annul an award of the Industrial Accident Commission.

Julio Landlin was a laborer and the employee in whose favor the award was made. On September 6, 1926, Landlin suffered an injury by being struck in his left eye by a flying nail. That the injury arose out of and in the course of the employment is not questioned. Prior to and at the time of the injury Landlin was afflicted with a nonindustrial disease by reason of which he had permanently lost 30/50ths of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Union Iron Works v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Liptak v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Franklin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Gardner v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Allied Compensation Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API