Legal Opinion

McMullen v. Conforti & Eisele, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 19, 1975PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam..By stipulation this case is submitted to the Court on briefs, without oral argument. The only issue raised is the constitutionality of the retrospective operation of R. 1:21-7, regulating contingent fee arrangements between attorney and client in certain kinds of tort cases, adopted to be effective January 31, 1972.

The wrongful death action herein was instituted on plaintiff’s behalf on August 2, 1969 by her attorneys, who are the real parties interested in the success of this appeal. They entered into a written agreement with plaintiff June 18, 1969 for a 33-1/3% contingent fee.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Calhoun v. MassieSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Merendino v. FMC Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  2. Atlantic City Mun. Utilities Authority v. HuntNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  3. Anderson v. ConleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  4. Kingman v. FinnertyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  5. Pacillo v. Harris Mfg. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API