Legal Opinion
Utica First Insurance v. Floyd Holding, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 29, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not obligated to defend or indemnify the defendant in an underlying action entitled Reynolds v Unique Custom Homes Corp., pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York under case No. CV 99 4064, the third-party defendant, RVI Insurance Agency, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated July 24, 2002, as denied that branch of its motion which was to dismiss the third-party action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7).
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Murphy v. KuhnNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Gorgone v. Regency Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Utica First Insurance v. Floyd Holding, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Colaio v. United Medical Examiners, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bleecker Street Health & Beauty Aids, Inc. v. Granite State InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Republic Long Island, Inc. v. Andrew J. Vanacore, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Florence Capital Advisors, LLC v. Thompson Flanagan & Co., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Florence Capital Advisors, LLC v. Thompson Flanagan & Co., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Seneca Ins. Co., Inc. v. Certified Moving & Stor. Co., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016