Legal Opinion

Gray v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 30, 1994No. C6-93-262, CX-93-264Published

1Opinion of the Court

519 N.W.2d 187 (1994)

John L. GRAY, Petitioner, Appellant (C6-93-262),

Sherry Jo Gray, Petitioner, Appellant (CX-93-264),

v.

COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Respondent.

Nos. C6-93-262, CX-93-264.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

June 30, 1994.

Faison T. Sessoms, Jr., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Jeffrey Bilcik, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered, and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.

OPINION

COYNE, Justice.

In this case the court of appeals affirmed an order of the district court sustaining the revocation of the driver's licenses of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ascher v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Gray v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Gray v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API