Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Walker

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 2008No. 41A01-0610-CV-462PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DARDEN, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Brandon Stanley (“Stanley”) challenges the trial court’s denial of his offer to prove, aimed at presenting evidence of write-offs redacted from the medical bills introduced into evidence by Danny Walker (“Walker”) and offered as proof of the extent of Walker’s medical expenses.

We affirm. 1

ISSUE

Whether the trial court improperly relied on Indiana’s collateral source statute as the basis for excluding Stanley’s proffered evidence of write-offs to Walker’s medical bills, offered to rebut Walker’s medical records, which omitted written-off charges and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Bozeman v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  3. Acuar v. LetourneauSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  4. Koffman v. LeichtfussWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Hardi v. MezzanotteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stanley v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Butler v. Indiana Department of InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Mary K. Patchett v. Ashley N. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Stanley v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API