Legal Opinion

People v. Watkins

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 23, 1976No. 26359PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kelley

This case involves several legal issues surrounding the unique problem of the in-court identification of a defendant whose twin was present at the scene of the alleged crime and the arrest. Defendant was subsequently convicted for dispensing a dangerous drug. 1969 Perm. Supp., C.R.S. 1963,48-8-2. We affirm.

On October 23, 1973, the jury was impanelled and sworn for defendant’s trial. The court ordered that the witnesses be sequestered and that they be instructed not to discuss the case with each other. Prior to the taking of evidence, the court learned that the defendant had a twin brother.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hampton v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  2. People v. SpinuzziSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  3. Johnson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  4. Duran v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  5. Barr v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. ThorpeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. People v. PickettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  3. People v. WoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. People v. BorregoColorado Court of Appeals · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API