Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Great Western Ins.

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided November 5, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from trial term. Action by Acalus L. Palmer against the Great Western Insurance Company on a policy of marine insurance. From a judgment ■ entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial made on the minutes, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

The action was upon the defendant’s policy, dated January 18, 1879, insuring P. J. Nevins & Son, "on account of whom it may concern,” against loss from the perils of the sea, barratry of the master or crew, and all other perils, losses, or misfortunes which should come to the hurt, detriment, or damage of the bark Brothers’ Pride, her tackle, apparel, and other furniture, “at and from Cardiff to and from Cienfuegos or other port or ports in Cuba, and thence to a port north of Hatteras,” in the sum of ¡¡¿2,000. The bark, inclusive of her tackle, apparel, and other furniture, was, by the terms…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brink v. . Hanover Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Hooper v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Keeney v. . Home Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Place v. . MinsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Walsh v. Washington Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Empire Coal Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. American Food Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  3. Monahan v. Metropolitan Surety Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API