Hackney v. West Jersey & Seashore Railroad
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Reed, J.
This writ brings up a judgment upon a verdict for the defendant in error, directed by the trial court.
The facts appearing upon the trial are these: Mr. Hackney, the plaintiff, on November 17th, 1906, between nine and ten o’clock in the forenoon, was driving along Atlantic avenue, in Atlantic City, a team attached to a wagon loaded with brush. The brush was loaded on shelvings, and the plaintiff was sitting on a seat supported by the shelvings on the front of *455tlie wagon, about midway between tlie sides. The load of brush was about twelve to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Newark Passenger Railway Co. v. BlockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
- Denis v. Lewiston, Brunswick & Bath Street Railway Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908
- Hannon v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
- Migans v. Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gentile v. Pub. Service Coordinated TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Farnsworth v. Tampa Electric Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1911
- Frasch Adoption CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949