McIntosh v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Wright District Court. — Hon. D. R. Hindman, Judge. Action to recover the possession of specific personal property. After the evidence was fully submitted a verdict for the defendant was returned by direction of the court, and a judgment rendered thereon. The plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
In June, 1882, Alexander Latter and Hr. Brackett owned and conducted a drugstore at Goldfield, Iowa. In the month named Latter sold an undivided one-half of the stock of goods and business to N. M. Melrose and Dr. Morse, and Dr. Brackett sold to them one-third of his share, so that each of the three persons last named owned one-third of the property, and the business was carried on by them as copartners for a time. Dr. Morse made no payment for his share, and after a few months withdrew from the firm. After his withdrawal the business was carried on by N. M. Mel-rose and Dr. Brackett until…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pike v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Reynolds v. Nichols & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1861
- Kinney v. McDermotSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- State v. NortonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
3Cited by2 opinions
- Toovey v. AyrhartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Edwards v. BoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913