Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Breckenridge

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 19, 1929Published

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

This is an' appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to a bill to reform a surety bond and for damages resulting from a breach of a building contract for the performance of which the appellant became surety by its bond.

The suit was begun by the appelleees Breckenridge, James, Jr., and Watts against T. C. Richardson, the contractor, and the appellant Aetna Casualty & Surety Company. The substance of the bill is that the complainants and Richardson entered into a contract on the 6th of February, 1926, in which Richardson agreed to build a house for the complainants. The contract is made a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Steinmeyer v. SchroeppelIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Jacobs v. ParodiSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  3. Stephens v. OrmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1862
  4. May v. MaySupreme Court of Florida · 1857
  5. Evans v. SummerlinSupreme Court of Florida · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API