Legal Opinion

Arkansas Foundry Company v. Poe

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 7, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). It is first insisted that the judgment of the probate court removing B. C. Barnes as administrator of the estate of Orby King and substituting in his place H. H. Morris, and abrogating the contract whereby B. O. Barnes, as administrator, had made a contract with Sam T. and Tom Poe to file and prosecute a damage suit against the Arkansas Foundry Company was correct, and that Sam T. and Tom Poe no longer had any right to represent the plaintiff in the damage suit.

We cannot agree with counsel in this contention. B. C. Barnes was duly appointed administrator…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railroad v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Hays & WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  3. Johnson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Procter v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. TerralSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. Beirne Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  2. Warren & Saline River Railroad v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API