Legal Opinion

Saxon v. Saxon

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1905PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Suit in partition. The plaintiff’s wife is the principal defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaynor, J.:

The plaintiff owned the land, and made deeds of conveyance of it to himself and his wife. The words of conveyance are to them and “ their heirs and assigns forever”. The wife claims that partition will not lie for the reason that she and her husband are each seized of the entirety under the conveyances. At common law a conveyance to husband and wife necessarily and unavoidably made them tenants by the entirety, the survivor to take the whole estate, owing to the common law rule of the unity of husband and wife. Notwithstanding the statutes in this state enabling married women to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Bertles v. . NunanNew York Court of Appeals · 1883

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of KlatzlNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Stuehm v. MikulskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Switzer v. PrattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  4. Edmonds v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  5. Irvine v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API