Legal Opinion

Stueckemann v. City of Basehor

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 24, 2015No. 105457Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 105,457 DANIEL L. STUECKEMANN and CATHY S. STUECKEMANN, Trustees of the Stueckemann Living Trust Dated May 13, 2004, and Any Amendments Thereto, and CEDAR LAKE ASSOCIATION, a Kansas Not-For-Profit Corporation, Appellants, v. THE CITY OF BASEHOR, KANSAS, A KANSAS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Appellate courts review challenges to a city's description of the land it intends to annex for substantial compliance with the relevant statutes. Substantial compliance means compliance in respect to the essential matters…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. Golden v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Hawley v. Kansas Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  5. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API