Legal Opinion

Barney v. Bell

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 10, 2014No. 2121048Published

1Opinion of the Court

On Applications for Rehearing

MOORE, Judge.

This court’s opinion of July 18, 2014, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor.

Arthur Barney appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Montgomery Circuit Court (“the trial court”) in favor of Elizabeth Bell, as personal representative of the estate of Maurice Bell, deceased, and William Clay Teague on Barney’s legal-malpractice claim.

Background

The record establishes the following pertinent facts. On July 15, 2010, Barney was injured in an automobile accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with the Lowndes…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hannah v. Gregg, Bland & Berry, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. LLOYD NOLAND FOUNDATION v. HealthSouth Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Smith v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. Hatton v. Chem-Haulers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. Davis v. Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API