In re for a Compulsory Accounting in the Estate of Frame
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, P. J.
By this appeal the decree of the Surrogate’s Court is attacked on several grounds. We are asked to review that court’s determination of the issues growing out of a proceeding consolidating (1) a compulsory accounting by the executors of the estate of Caroline W. Frame; (2) a voluntary accounting by the said executors; and (3) a proceeding begun by Montgomery Waddell, one of the executors, to fix and determine under section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act the counsel fee to be paid for services rendered to the estate.
The surrogate surcharged the executors with the sum of $57,297.92 by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Adair v. . BrimmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Holden v. . New York and Erie BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- In Re the Accounting of NilesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Villard v. . VillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re the Estate of JanesNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Marcus v. OtisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- In re the Estate of JanesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of New Rochelle Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- In re the Accounting of Central Hanover BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.