Legal Opinion

Eduardo Nunez v. CitiMortgage, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 21, 2015No. 14-50261Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Eduardo and Maricela Nunez appeal the district court’s judgment in favor of Citi-Mortgage, Inc. The Nunezes brought this action in Texas state court under article XVI, section 50(a)(6) of the Texas Constitution, challenging the validity of a home equity loan they obtained in 2006 from CitiMortgage’s predecessor in interest, ABN AMRO Mortgage Group (“AAMG”). The district court dismissed the Nunezes’ complaint because the statute of limitations had run. Finding no error, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

I

The Nunezes took out a home equity loan in 2006 and simultaneously…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Bustos v. Martini Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. Isaiah Russell Jones Robert Sparks, Jr. Herman Parks, Jr. v. Alcoa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API