Legal Opinion

Kane v. Williamstown Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 2013No. Docket No. 311182PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoekstra, J.

In this medical marijuana case, we granted the prosecution’s application for leave to appeal to consider whether questions of fact regarding the applicability of immunity under § 4 of the Michigan Medical *569Marijuana Act (MMMA), MCL 333.26421 et seq.,1 must be resolved by the trial court or by a jury. Unpublished order of the Court of Appeals, entered January 8, 2013 (Docket No. 312065). In this context, the question of whether Michigan residency is a prerequisite to valid possession of a registiy identification card under the MMMA also arises. Because we hold that residency is a prerequisite…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. ChismMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. D'AngeloMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. PeltolaMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  5. People v. Kolanek; People v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Higgins LakeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. Majid Damghani v. City of KentwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Petersen Financial LLC v. City of KentwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API