Legal Opinion

Clark v. Clark

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1920PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Clinton county.

1Opinion of the CourtCushing, J.

The action in the court below was for the partition of two tracts of land, 50 acres and 17.23 acres. The petition states that Eugene, Elsie and Thaddius H. Vandervert were the children and heirs at law of Edith Clark, deceased, that she was the daughter of Samantha J. Clark, and that Samantha J. Clark was the daughter of Josiah McKibben; that they are each entitled to an undivided one-tenth of the land described above; that Arthur Clark and Nina Deady, and the defendants in error, Atwood Clark and Alta Jones, each own an undivided one-fifth of said real estate.

Arthur Clark in his answer…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Parker v. Parker's AdministratorOhio Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Port of Portland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Merritt v. CarrOhio Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API