People v. Rogers
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of murder in the first degree; from the judgment therein, and an order refusing him a new trial, he has appealed.
He contends that the prosecution was allowed, over his objection, to introduce evidence which tended to show that prior to the night on which he is alleged to have murdered Kimball, the deceased, while burglarizing the latter’s house, another burglary had been committed of a, saloon belonging to Knight and Pardee, situated some *566twelve miles distant from the place of Kimball’s murder, and that' from the saloon a pistol, a small…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Fitch v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. NakisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. RuefCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Vickers v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.