In re Cholis
Indiana Supreme Court
1Per curiam
These disciplinary proceedings, which arise out of the same series of events, were initiated against the Respondents by the Disciplinary Commission of this Court. Both Respondents are charged with violating Disciplinary Rules 7-102(A) and 1-102(A) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. In accordance with Admission and Discipline Rule 23, this Court appointed a Hearing Officer who has now tendered his findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendation to this Court. Neither the Disciplinary Commission nor the Respondents have petitioned for review of these findings. In that these…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re CottonIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re CottonIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- In the Matter of James R. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Matter of FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.