Gallagher v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Petition for rehearing. Gallagher & Ascher v. United States (4 Ct. Cust. Appls., 308; T. D. 33518).
1Opinion of the Court
Per curiam :
The allegations of this petition are so at variance with
the facts as understood by the court that it is deemed advisable to briefly refer thereto in denying the petition.
The case grew out of a challenge of the jurisdiction of a board of three general appraisers in a reappraisement proceeding arising at the port of Chicago and decided at the port of New York. This court affirmed a majority decision of the board holding that the reap-praisement board had jurisdiction. (4 Ct. Cust. Appls., 308; T. D. 33518.) This petition alleges that the court thereby reversed its previous decisions…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tilge v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Maddaus v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Oelrichs & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Tilge v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Harris v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Johnson Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919