Legal Opinion

In Re Gregory A. Lemaire, Debtor. Paul Handeen v. Gregory A. Lemaire

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 5, 1989No. 88-5275Published

1Opinion of the Court

883 F.2d 1373

58 USLW 2045, 21 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 678,

19 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 1016, Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,005

In re Gregory A. LeMAIRE, Debtor.

Paul HANDEEN, Appellant,

v.

Gregory A. LeMAIRE, Appellee.

No. 88-5275.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eighth Circuit.

July 5, 1989.

Before McMILLIAN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.

MAGILL, Circuit Judge.

1

In this appeal, we consider for the first time the dischargeability under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Reform Act, 11 U.S.C. Secs. 1301 et seq., of a civil judgment owed to an assault victim by an assailant. The creditor-victim urges us to adopt a bright…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. In Re Ronald Estus and Doris Estus, Debtors. United States of America v. Ronald EstusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  4. In Re Charles E. Kitchens and Olivia L. Kitchens, Bankrupt. Charles E. Kitchens and Olivia L. Kitchens v. Georgia Railroad Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  5. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb, Debtors. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb v. Harry W. Heid, Chapter 13 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API