Legal Opinion
Amols v. Bernstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 27, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Merrell, J.:
The action was brought by the plaintiff in replevin to recover from the defendant, a pawnbroker, the possession of a diamond ring of the value of $900. Admitting the possession of the ring in question, the defendant alleges as an affirmative defense that he is an innocent pledgee of the ring without notice, and has a lien thereon by virtue of a loan made.
The evidence upon the trial in the Municipal Court was to the effect that on February 19, 1924, two men came to the plaintiff’s place of business and examined a diamond ring then on display in the plaintiff’s shop, the sale price…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marden v. . DorthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- People v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Phelps v. . McQuadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Shipply v. . People of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Phelps v. McQuadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gustafson v. Equitable Loan Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Stanton Motor Corp. v. RosettiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- In re SagmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Appleman v. GabelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Metacoustic, Inc. v. Parkway Marine Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.