Legal Opinion

Teal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 17, 2003No. 2D03-1446PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

862 So.2d 871 (2003)

William E. TEAL, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D03-1446.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 17, 2003.

Rehearing Denied January 14, 2004.

SILBERMAN, Judge.

William E. Teal challenges the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He argues that he did not qualify for a habitual felony offender sentence because he did not have the necessary predicate convictions. As explained below, we disagree and affirm the sentence. Regarding Teal's claims that the judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. McCall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Love v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Prudent v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Rivera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  4. Teal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  5. Biamonte v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API