Worsham v. Palmer
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
The defendant contends that the court erred in not sustaining the general demurrer to the original petition as amended, because the amendment filed did not add any new facts or any sufficient facts, construed with the original petition, to set out a cause of action. As to this phase of the defendant’s contention, counsel calls attention to the following decisions: Jones v. Butler, 191 Ga. 126 (12 S. E. 2d 326); Wood v. Southern Trust Co., 12 Ga. App. 165 (76 S. E. 991); Baker v. City of Atlanta, 22 Ga. App. 483 (96 S. E. 332); Pasco Flour Mills Co. v. City Supply Co., 23 Ga. App. 95 (97 S. E.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Stack v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Kleinberg v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Marr v. DieterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Lavenden v. HasemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Baker v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.