Legal Opinion

Devlin v. Bevins

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1861PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion by defendant to strike out the plaintiff’s reply.

1Opinion of the Court

Leonard, Justice.

The motion, to strike out the reply must be granted, no counter-claim being set up by the answer.

The word “ defence” in section 154, is to be understood as meaning counter-claim.

Whether that meaning be given to section 154 or not, a reply cannot be permitted where no counter-claim is interposed by the answer, if full effect be given to section 168 of the Code.

The new matter set up in the answer, where it does not constitute a counter-claim, is to be deemed controverted by the adverse party, as upon a direct denial or avoidance, as the case may require. (Williams agt. Upton, 8…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Quin v. ChambersThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. N. Y., Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Ward v. ComegysNew York Supreme Court · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API