Devlin v. Bevins
New York Supreme Court
Motion by defendant to strike out the plaintiff’s reply.
1Opinion of the Court
Leonard, Justice.
The motion, to strike out the reply must be granted, no counter-claim being set up by the answer.
The word “ defence” in section 154, is to be understood as meaning counter-claim.
Whether that meaning be given to section 154 or not, a reply cannot be permitted where no counter-claim is interposed by the answer, if full effect be given to section 168 of the Code.
The new matter set up in the answer, where it does not constitute a counter-claim, is to be deemed controverted by the adverse party, as upon a direct denial or avoidance, as the case may require. (Williams agt. Upton, 8…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Quin v. ChambersThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853
3Cited by2 opinions
- N. Y., Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1887
- Ward v. ComegysNew York Supreme Court · 1885