Legal Opinion

State v. Bowden

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 19, 2007No. 030431874; A128452PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment revoking his probation based on two subsequent juvenile adjudications and imposing a presumptive sentence. He contends that the mandatory revocation of probation under ORS 137.712(5) applies only to persons who commit new crimes and, because a juvenile adjudication is not a conviction of a crime, the revocation was in error. Because this case presents a matter of statutory construction, we review for errors of law, Holbrook v. Precision Helicopters, Inc., 162 Or App 538, 541, 986 P2d 646, rev den, 329 Or 527 (1999). We affirm.

The facts are undisputed. When…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Holbrook v. Precision Helicopters, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. R. J. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API