Legal Opinion
United States v. Scott
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 23, 1994No. Nos. 92-3175, 92-3250, 92-3255 to 92-3258, 92-3265 and 92-3291PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
In this opinion we address the direct criminal appeals of eight defendants — Robert D. Scott, Edward T. Skinner, Alex Yung, Steven J. Hemsley, Conrad L. Caldwell, James M. Peterson, James M. Peterson, IV, and Mary M. Wilson — who were tried together and convicted in a jury trial of conspiracy to defraud the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. The conspiracy alleged was to defraud by impeding, obstructing, and defeating the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in the assessment and collection of federal income taxes.
On appeal counsel for four defendants submitted…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commissioner v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. HardwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. BedfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Kenneth Wayne StigerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. HanzlicekCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.