O'Rear v. Diaz
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK O’REAR, Plaintif€, 24 Civ. 1669 (PAE) -y- ORDER ARMANDO DIAZ ET AL., Defendants. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: The Court has received a letter from counsel for plaintiff S. O’Rear arguing that defendants Merkley+Partners (“Merkley”) and Omnicom Group Inc. (““Omnicom,” and together, “Corporate Defendants”) wrongly withheld certain documents as privileged, Dkt. 114, and Corporate Defendants’ response, Dkt. 118. The Court denies O’Rear’s demand for production of these documents. Based on the description of the documents on…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pritchard v. County of ErieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Delphi Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011