Legal Opinion

O'Rear v. Diaz

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 26, 2025No. 1:24-cv-01669Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK O’REAR, Plaintif€, 24 Civ. 1669 (PAE) -y- ORDER ARMANDO DIAZ ET AL., Defendants. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: The Court has received a letter from counsel for plaintiff S. O’Rear arguing that defendants Merkley+Partners (“Merkley”) and Omnicom Group Inc. (““Omnicom,” and together, “Corporate Defendants”) wrongly withheld certain documents as privileged, Dkt. 114, and Corporate Defendants’ response, Dkt. 118. The Court denies O’Rear’s demand for production of these documents. Based on the description of the documents on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pritchard v. County of ErieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. Delphi Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API