Legal Opinion
Dunbar v. Oconomowoc Cemetery Ass'n
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.
The defendant is a cemetery association, organized and existing under the laws of the state of Wisconsin. ' Sec. 157.07 of the Statutes of 1925 provides:
“The board shall survey and plat such portions of the lands as may from time to time be required for burial, into *165lots, drives and walks, and record map thereof in the office of the register of deeds. For failure to do so, each trustee of an association shall forfeit twenty-five dollars to the association.”
Sec. 157.08 provides:
“(1) After the map is so recorded, the board may sell and convey platted lots, expressly restricting the use to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Evergreen Cemetery Ass'n v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
- Hollman v. City of PlattevilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Burke v. WallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
- Mount Hope Cemetery Ass'n v. New Mount Hope Cemetery Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Carter v. Town of AvocaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Oak Park Cemetery, Inc. v. DonaldsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Town of Blooming Grove v. Roselawn Memorial Park Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- City View Cemetery Ass'n v. Salem Mausoleum & Crematorium, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
- People ex rel. Keller v. La Vista Cemetery Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Wilder v. Evangelical Lutheran Joint SynodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.