Legal Opinion
State v. DRH
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 2, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
127 N.J. 249 (1992)
604 A.2d 89
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
D.R.H., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued October 21, 1991.
Decided April 2, 1992.
Gilbert G. Miller, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Nicholas L. Bissell, Jr., Somerset County Prosecutor, attorney).
Thomas A. Pavics argued the cause for respondent (Schachter, Trombadore, Offen, Stanton & Pavics, attorneys).
Debra L. Stone, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General of New Jersey (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney).
William C. Cagney…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- State v. GrossSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- State v. R.W.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- State v. D.R.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. Broom-SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009