Legal Opinion

Hamm v. Knocke

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 17, 1973No. Civ. A. F-564PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT

CROCKER, District Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. This is a civil action wherein Phillip Hamm and Nina Hamm, his wife, the Plaintiffs in this lawsuit charge the sole Defendant, William M. Knocke, with infringement of their alleged service mark and trademark rights in the words DROWNPROOF and DROWNPROOF-ING and the like, charge' the Defendant with related unfair competition and also charge the Defendant with alleged infringement of a copyrighted motion picture.

2. Jurisdiction for this lawsuit is proper, as conceded by Defendant, under the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Standard Paint Co. v. Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. G. & C. Merriam Co. v. SaalfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  5. Saalfield Pub. Co. v. G. & C. Merriam Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Computerland Corp. v. Microland Computer Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1984
  2. Clarke v. K-MARTDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API