Legal Opinion

Mantle Lamp Co. v. Rucker

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 25, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Turner, Commissioner

Reversing,

Appellee bought from appellant certain lamps and accessories, and failing to pay for them, this action for the purchase price was instituted.

The defendant in his answer relied upon an alleged warranty of the chattels so sold to him, and states:

“The plaintiff warranted the lamps in question to be salable, merchantable, or a better value and smaller price than other lamps of a similar make and kind, ’ ’

and then alleges he relied on these statements, and that they were untrue.

The court overruled a demurrer to this pleading, and on the trial…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McClintock v. Emick, Stoner & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McHargue v. Fayette Coal & Feed CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  2. Topeka Mill & Elevator Co. v. TriplettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  3. Keenan v. D.H. Blair & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  4. Wedding v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API