Legal Opinion
American Hoesch, Inc. v. Steamship Aubade
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided September 11, 1970No. Civ. A. 69-1044PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Defendants move for summary judgment placing reliance on the time-for-suit provisions of 46 U.S.C. § 1303(6), which provides:
* * * In any event the carrier and the ship shall be discharged from all liability in respect of loss or damage unless suit is brought within one year after delivery of the goods or the date when the goods should have been delivered: Provided, That if a notice of loss or damage, either apparent or concealed, is not given as provided for in this section, that fact shall not affect or prejudice the right of the shipper to bring suit within…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Midstate Horticultural Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- M. v. M., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Gloucester Mutual Fishing Insurance v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- American Oil & Supply Co. v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- C. TENNANT SONS & COMPANY v. Norddeutscher LloydDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Underwood Cotton Company, Inc. v. Hyundai Merchant Marine (America), Inc. Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Petroleos Mexicanos Refinacion v. M/T King a (Ex-Tbilisi)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Distribution Services, Ltd. v. Eddie Parker Interests, Inc., D/B/A New Trends, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Lithotip, CA v. S.S. GuaricoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Orient Atlantic Parco, Inc. v. Maersk LinesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.