Application of Schlittner
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
This is a petition by Daniel Schlittner asking that, pursuant to Rule 26 of the Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S., we waive the provisions of Rules 34(b)(2), (b)(4), and (c)(1)(D) of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S. and allow him to apply for admission to the Arizona Bar. We write this opinion to clarify the policy of the Court when considering petitions for waiver of the Rules filed by potential applicants who have graduated from foreign English speaking law schools teaching the common law.
Our rule reads in part:
1. No applicant for admission to the state bar shall be…
2Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Collins-Bazant for Admission to the Nebraska State Bar on ExaminationNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- In re MacartneyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re YisaKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- Bring v. North Carolina State BarCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997