Legal Opinion
Firestone Tire & Rubber Company v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided October 11, 1973No. C.D. 4474, Court 72-5-01060 and 72-9-01969PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NEWMAN, Judge:
In these consolidated civil actions, the parties agree that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and they have filed cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to rule 8.2.
The imported merchandise consists of so-called top and bottom domes for premix sode syrup containers manufactured in the United States by a division of Firestone, and then shipped to Uniroyal, Ltd. in Montreal, Canada (Uniroyal). At Uniroyal, by the application of a rubber coating, a shock resistant quality was imparted to the domes. Thereafter, they were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fleming v. Hawkeye Pearl Button Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Woolart Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Intelex Systems, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sigma Instruments, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Sigma Instruments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Washington International Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003