Legal Opinion

Heisterman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 24, 1976No. 75-974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant was found guilty by a jury of: (1) assault with intent to commit murder in the first degree, and (2) shooting into an occupied dwelling. He received a sentence of five years in the state prison on the first charge and a sentence of five years probation on the second charge, the sentences to run consecutively.

Six points have been raised on this appeal. Each will be discussed briefly in the order presented. The first point urges error upon the denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss the information on the ground that the information does not state sufficient facts. See Hamilton v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BarberSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. Yost v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. Cone v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  4. Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  5. Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kimbrough v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Hegstrom v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. State v. FriedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API