Legal Opinion

State v. Stalder

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 23, 1992No. 90C-21105; CA A71343PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of assault in the first degree with a firearm and possession of a dangerous weapon with the intent to use it unlawfully. ORS 163.185; ORS 166.220. We remand for resentencing.

Defendant argues that the court erred in not instructing the jury that his actions were taken in self-defense. There was no error. His defense was in fact not self-defense, which, under ORS 161.209, 1 requires that a person have a reasonable belief that the degree of force used is necessary to counter unlawful physical force. Defendant testified that the weapon discharged by accident. That…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BoyceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Layton v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Holcomb v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API