Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Senate
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
On May 14, 2003, Judicial Watch, Inc. (“Plaintiff’), a non-profit educational foundation, filed the above-captioned action against the United States Senate, the Secretary of the United States Senate, and the Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate (collectively, “Defendants”). Through its complaint, Plaintiff seeks to challenge the constitutionality of the Senate filibuster as it applies to judicial nominees. More precisely, Plaintiff contends that the Senate Rules effectively impose a supermajority voting requirement for judicial…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States SenateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States SenateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005