Lovely v. State

ALDERMAN, Chief Judge.

The defendant entered pleas of nolo con-tendere to breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor and resisting arrest with violence, reserving the right to appeal. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress certain tangible evidence seized at his apartment after his arrest. We find no error in the trial court’s ruling and affirm.

The testimony at the suppression hearing establishes that in the early morning hours Deputy Sheriff Hummel was dispatched to a convenience store, where he observed that the glass doors had been broken and…