Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Brockelmann

New York Marine Court

Decided January 15, 1874Published

Motion to vacate a writ of attachment.

1Opinion of the Court 1

Shea, Ch. J.

This is an action for seaman’s wages. The motion is made to vacate a writ of attachment issued in this action, and to discharge from the custody of the local law the bark Earnest and Benno, the prop,erty of the defendant, now held by virtue of that writ. The defendant declines the jurisdiction of the courts of the State; and the consul-general of the German empire, resident at the port of New York, presents an official protest to the court, denying its right to retain jurisdiction “ especially ” in “differences of any kind” “in reference to wages and the execution of mutual…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Joaohimsen.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Foster v. NeilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Mayor v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  3. Ex Parte NewmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. The Bello Corrunes. The Spanish ConsulSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  5. Saltus v. Ocean InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1817

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API