Legal Opinion

Holcombe v. Commissioner of Corp. & Taxation

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 25, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The petitioners who are the duly appointed and qualified trustees of the will of Edwin Ginn bring suit in the first and second cases for full abatement of additional income taxes assessed and paid under protest for the years 1918 and 1919, after an original assessment on income received in those years had been paid, and in the third case for a partial abatement of a tax assessed on income received in 1920. St. 1916, c. 269, §§ 2, 5, 9, 14, 19. St. 1920, c. 385, § 4. Faulkner v. Tax Commissioner, 229 Mass. 120.

The first question is whether the moneys received by the trustees in 1918 and 1919…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Francis v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. McMurtrie v. GuilerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Parkhurst v. GinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Raymer v. Tax CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Wheelwright v. Tax CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kavanaugh v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Wolbach v. Commissioner of Corp. & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Tirrell v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. RathboneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Parker v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API