In re Tosh

frPER CURIAM. *

Respondent, Joseph J. Tosh, seeks review of the hearing committee’s denial of his motion to set aside the order deeming the *397charges against him admitted based on his failure to submit a timely answer.

On April 20, 1998, Charles Plattsmier, Chief Disciplinary Counsel for the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”), granted the respondent a two day extension of time, until April 22, 1998, within which to file an answer to the formal charges since respondent initially failed to file his answer timely. The following day, respondent, through counsel, mailed his answer to the correct…