Commonwealth v. Kopsala
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The defendant was convicted by a judge, sitting without a jury, of rape and indecent assault and battery on a person fourteen years of age or older.
*388On appeal, the defendant claims that the judge committed error in denying his motion for a mistrial based on misinformation furnished to the defendant by the Commonwealth prior to his trial. He also claims that the acts of rape and indecent assault and battery were so closely related in fact that they constituted a single crime, and supported only a single conviction and sentence.
Facts. We outline the evidence introduced by the Commonwealth,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CundriffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Ciummei v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. MamayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. SanchezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Commonwealth v. SchofieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. CruzMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. BackusMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- A.P. v. M.T.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
- Commonwealth v. CruzMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.