Legal Opinion

Gilligan v. Procaccino

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

In each of these three proceedings, the petitioners are nonlawyer “ Law Secretaries to Justices” of the Supreme Court in either the First or Second Departments. Bach claims that increased salaries were unlawfully withheld from him and they brought the proceedings below in an effort to recover the *166amount of the salary increase claimed to have been unlawfully withheld. Their petitions should be granted.

In 1961, the Legislature made appropriations for increased salaries for “ certain officers and employees of the judiciary ”. (L. 1961, ch. 492.) An additional increase was similarly provided for…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blyn v. BartlettNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Blyn v. BartlettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Ascione v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Blyn v. BartlettNew York Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API