Legal Opinion

Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 11, 1940No. 4-5819PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin Smiti-i, C. J.

The appeal is from a judgment for accrued benefits under a policy compensating the insured if totally and permanently disabled. Ther'e was an intervention by Vance M. Thompson with which we are not concerned. The only question is whether the trial court abused its discretion in declining to direct the plaintiff (appellee Phillips here) to subject himself to an X-ray examination in Little Rook or Pine Bluff. It was stipulated that physicians in Sheridan were not equipped with necessary appliances. Phillips claimed to be suffering from a peptic ulcer of the duodenal cap.

Suit was brought in.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sibley v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  2. Railway Company v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  3. Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co. v. Ruff & Henry Gramling Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Greenhow v. Whitehead's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1946
  2. The Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API