Legal Opinion

People v. Simone

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1976PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Since the record discloses no more than "mere whim, caprice, or idle curiosity” for the stop of defendant’s automobile, the physical evidence seized as a result thereof should have been suppressed (People v Ingle, 36 NY2d 413, 420).

Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, the plea vacated, and the indictment dismissed.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. IngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. SobotkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. AlmesticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. People v. AllendeNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. People v. DriscollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API