People v. Simone
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. Since the record discloses no more than "mere whim, caprice, or idle curiosity” for the stop of defendant’s automobile, the physical evidence seized as a result thereof should have been suppressed (People v Ingle, 36 NY2d 413, 420).
Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, the plea vacated, and the indictment dismissed.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.
Order reversed, etc.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. IngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. SobotkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. AlmesticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. AllendeNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- People v. DriscollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.