Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Henderson v. Nucon Construction Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 20, 2001No. 99-15985; D.C. No. CV-90-00182-ACMPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM1

C.W. Henderson Construction Company, C.W. Henderson and Wanda Henderson (collectively “Henderson”) appeal the district court’s order awarding Henderson no damages. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of the case, we do not recount it here except as necessary to explain our decision.

We review the district court’s factual findings for clear error and its contract interpretation de novo. Penthouse Int’l, Ltd. v. Barnes, 792 F.2d 943, 948 (9th Cir.1986). The facts are clear and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Amarel v. ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Penthouse International, Ltd., a New York Corporation v. Priscilla BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Arizona Eastern Railroad v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API