Legal Opinion
United States v. Raul Jiminez
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 16, 2007No. 06-3755PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNOR, Associate Justice (Ret.).
A jury convicted Raul Jiminez of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of methamphetamine. Jiminez challenges the proceedings below on two grounds. First, Jiminez contends that the district court improperly allowed certain evidence to be introduced which was unfairly prejudicial. Second, Jiminez contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in the contested evidentiary rulings and a reasonable jury could have found Jiminez guilty…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Jose EspinoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Wade v. HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Louis BoykinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Gabriel Parra LopezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- United States v. Daniel MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. GillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BoesenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Rolon-RamosCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. DonnellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.